8 Comments
User's avatar
John F. Foley's avatar

This is a great resource. Very helpful, particularly for an adult learner/improver. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Nick Visel's avatar

John,

Thanks for this feedback! This is exactly what I’m hoping for with this series! Anything you think that is missing that could make these posts even better?

Thanks!

Nick

Expand full comment
John F. Foley's avatar

Thanks, Nick. Seems pretty complete to me!

Best,

John

Expand full comment
LHOOQ's avatar

i think Morphy's good to study, but I think studying him tends to be overrated. People know things like the Two Knights defense against the Italian better than Morphy's opponents did at a much lower level. I believe Alexander Alekhine is really the first guy to study in depth if you're an attacking player. His opponents would survive the opening and be developed, so you get better middle game lessons.

Expand full comment
Nick Visel's avatar

It's true, the level of amateur play has risen dramatically, especially in the last ten years. I still think Morphy's worth studying though. I would worry less about all the specific lines he played and more about his general style though. The Two Knights is a pain for White for sure.

I'm with you on Alekhine and learning the attack (I've studied at least 300 games of his).

Expand full comment
Oscar's avatar

How about The Genius of Paul Morphy, by Chris Ward?

Expand full comment
Nick Visel's avatar

I haven't read it. Any good?

Expand full comment
Oscar's avatar

I haven’t read it. The reviews on Amazon are split. I was hoping somebody here would have read it.

Expand full comment